Cypress Club Pairs Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Scores after 24 boards Average: 60.0 Section A
Pair Pct Score Qualifiers Section Rank Overall Rank MPs
C D E C D E C D E
2 61.67 74.00 Q C 1 1 1.99R/B Anne Nellis - Bob Nellis
11 59.17 71.00 Q Q E 2 1 1 2 1 1 1.51R/B Carolyn Ashley - Clark Woomer
3 56.67 68.00 Q C 3/4 3/4 0.98R/B Murray Unger - Blue Greenberg
4 56.67 68.00 Q Q D 3/4 2 3/4 2 1.13R/B Thelma Vickers - Michael Carrigan
9 52.92 63.50 Q Q D 5 3 3 0.85R/B Joanna Johnson - John Taylor
5 49.17 59.00 Q Q E 4/5 2/3 4/5 2/3 0.73R/B Stephen Edwards - Alan Goldman
6 49.17 59.00 Q Q E 4/5 2/3 4/5 2/3 0.73R/B Mel Deener - Sterling Brockwell
1 48.75 58.50 E Sandy Schneider - Doris Houk
10 47.50 57.00 D Rebecca Hutchison - Barbara McKee
8 46.25 55.50 E Tony Zoppo - Norman Caine
12 36.25 43.50 C Ilse Anke - Maude Bergmann
7 35.83 43.00 D Larry Calhoun - Emily Hungerford
RESULTS OF BOARD 1
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
500 5.00 0.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
460 4.00 1.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
150 0.50 4.50 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
300 2.00 3.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
400 3.00 2.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
150 0.50 4.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 1-Schneider-Houk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 2
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 2.00 3.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
50 4.00 1.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
200 0.00 5.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
120 1.00 4.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
100 5.00 0.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
80 3.00 2.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 1-Schneider-Houk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 3
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 3.00 2.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
800 5.00 0.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
50 2.00 3.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
500 4.00 1.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
870 0.00 5.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
140 1.00 4.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 1-Schneider-Houk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 4
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 4.50 0.50 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 1-Schneider-Houk
130 2.00 3.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
130 2.00 3.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
110 0.00 5.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
630 4.50 0.50 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
130 2.00 3.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 5
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 0.00 5.00 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 1-Schneider-Houk
130 5.00 0.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
90 2.00 3.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
100 1.00 4.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
120 3.50 1.50 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
120 3.50 1.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 6
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 1.50 3.50 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 1-Schneider-Houk
650 1.50 3.50 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
100 4.00 1.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
100 4.00 1.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
100 4.00 1.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
1430 0.00 5.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 7
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 0.00 5.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
200 1.50 3.50 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
300 5.00 0.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
170 3.00 2.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
100 4.00 1.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 1-Schneider-Houk
200 1.50 3.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 8
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 5.00 0.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
100 2.00 3.00 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
140 3.50 1.50 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
130 0.00 5.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
140 3.50 1.50 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 1-Schneider-Houk
100 1.00 4.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 9
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 0.00 5.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
110 3.00 2.00 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
150 1.00 4.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
100 4.00 1.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
100 5.00 0.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 1-Schneider-Houk
140 2.00 3.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 10
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
230 0.00 5.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
170 2.00 3.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
170 2.00 3.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
110 4.00 1.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
300 5.00 0.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
170 2.00 3.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 11
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 5.00 0.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
150 0.50 4.50 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
120 2.00 3.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
110 3.50 1.50 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
110 3.50 1.50 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
150 0.50 4.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 12
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 4.00 1.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
100 1.00 4.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
650 4.00 1.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
650 4.00 1.00 10-Hutchison-McKee vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
100 1.00 4.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
100 1.00 4.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 13
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 1.00 4.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 1-Schneider-Houk
PASS 4.00 1.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
100 3.00 2.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
110 5.00 0.00 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
110 2.00 3.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
400 0.00 5.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 14
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 3.00 2.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 1-Schneider-Houk
450 3.00 2.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
50 0.00 5.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
450 3.00 2.00 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
450 3.00 2.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
450 3.00 2.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 15
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 5.00 0.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 1-Schneider-Houk
50 3.50 1.50 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
460 0.00 5.00 7-Calhoun-Hungerford vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
50 3.50 1.50 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
430 1.00 4.00 11-Ashley-Woomer vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
400 2.00 3.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 16
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.00 3.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
170 0.00 5.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
100 4.50 0.50 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
140 2.00 3.00 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
100 4.50 0.50 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
140 2.00 3.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 17
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.50 2.50 1-Schneider-Houk vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
50 4.00 1.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
140 5.00 0.00 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
50 2.50 2.50 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
100 1.00 4.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
110 0.00 5.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 18
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.50 1.50 1-Schneider-Houk vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
100 0.00 5.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 2-Nellis-Nellis
620 3.50 1.50 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
620 3.50 1.50 8-Zoppo-Caine vs 5-Edwards-Goldman
300 1.00 4.00 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
620 3.50 1.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 19
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 3.00 2.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
100 1.00 4.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
400 2.00 3.00 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
170 0.00 5.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
550 4.50 0.50 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
550 4.50 0.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 20
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 2.00 3.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
120 0.00 5.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
130 2.00 3.00 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
130 2.00 3.00 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
200 4.50 0.50 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
200 4.50 0.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 21
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
490 2.50 2.50 1-Schneider-Houk vs 6-Deener-Brockwell
450 5.00 0.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
490 2.50 2.50 4-Vickers-Carrigan vs 3-Unger-Greenberg
990 0.50 4.50 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
990 0.50 4.50 9-Johnson-Taylor vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
460 4.00 1.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 22
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.50 3.50 1-Schneider-Houk vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
200 5.00 0.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
100 1.50 3.50 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
150 3.50 1.50 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
150 3.50 1.50 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
50 0.00 5.00 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 23
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 3.00 2.00 1-Schneider-Houk vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
100 5.00 0.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
650 3.00 2.00 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
680 0.50 4.50 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
650 3.00 2.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
680 0.50 4.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 24
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 1.50 3.50 1-Schneider-Houk vs 9-Johnson-Taylor
420 3.00 2.00 2-Nellis-Nellis vs 7-Calhoun-Hungerford
450 4.50 0.50 3-Unger-Greenberg vs 10-Hutchison-McKee
450 4.50 0.50 5-Edwards-Goldman vs 4-Vickers-Carrigan
170 0.00 5.00 6-Deener-Brockwell vs 11-Ashley-Woomer
200 1.50 3.50 12-Anke-Bergmann vs 8-Zoppo-Caine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 1
Sandy Schneider - Doris Houk
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum E Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE E-W 12 -150 4.5 13 N BOTH E-W 2 200 4
2 E N-S E-W 12 80 2 14 E NONE E-W 2 -450 2
3 S E-W E-W 12 140 4 15 S N-S E-W 2 -100 0
4 W BOTH E-W 4 -630 0.5 16 W E-W N-S 10 -140 2
5 N N-S E-W 4 300 5 17 N NONE N-S 10 -50 2.5
6 E E-W E-W 4 650 3.5 18 E N-S N-S 10 620 3.5
7 S BOTH E-W 11 100 1 19 S E-W N-S 6 420 3
8 W NONE E-W 11 -140 1.5 20 W BOTH N-S 6 130 2
9 N E-W E-W 11 -100 0 21 N N-S N-S 6 -490 2.5
10 E BOTH N-S 8 -230 0 22 E E-W N-S 9 100 1.5
11 S NONE N-S 8 -50 5 23 S BOTH N-S 9 -650 3
12 W N-S N-S 8 650 4 24 W NONE N-S 9 200 1.5
SESSION SCORE: 58.50 PERCENT: 48.75
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 2
Anne Nellis - Bob Nellis
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum C Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE N-S 9 500 5 13 N BOTH N-S 1 -200 1
2 E N-S N-S 9 -110 2 14 E NONE N-S 1 450 3
3 S E-W N-S 9 300 3 15 S N-S N-S 1 100 5
4 W BOTH E-W 12 -130 3 16 W E-W E-W 3 170 5
5 N N-S E-W 12 -120 1.5 17 N NONE E-W 3 -50 1
6 E E-W E-W 12 1430 5 18 E N-S E-W 3 100 5
7 S BOTH E-W 5 300 5 19 S E-W N-S 10 -100 1
8 W NONE E-W 5 -150 0 20 W BOTH N-S 10 120 0
9 N E-W E-W 5 170 5 21 N N-S N-S 10 -450 5
10 E BOTH E-W 11 -300 0 22 E E-W N-S 7 200 5
11 S NONE E-W 11 110 1.5 23 S BOTH N-S 7 100 5
12 W N-S E-W 11 100 4 24 W NONE N-S 7 420 3
SESSION SCORE: 74.00 PERCENT: 61.67 Session rank: 1(C)
Event rank: 1(C)
MASTER POINTS: 1.00 Red, 0.99 Black (Overall) (Stratum C)
QUALIFIED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 3
Murray Unger - Blue Greenberg
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum C Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE N-S 8 460 4 13 N BOTH E-W 11 110 3
2 E N-S N-S 8 50 4 14 E NONE E-W 11 -450 2
3 S E-W N-S 8 800 5 15 S N-S E-W 11 430 4
4 W BOTH E-W 9 -130 3 16 W E-W N-S 2 -170 0
5 N N-S E-W 9 -90 3 17 N NONE N-S 2 50 4
6 E E-W E-W 9 -100 1 18 E N-S N-S 2 -100 0
7 S BOTH E-W 12 200 3.5 19 S E-W E-W 4 -400 3
8 W NONE E-W 12 100 4 20 W BOTH E-W 4 -130 3
9 N E-W E-W 12 140 3 21 N N-S E-W 4 490 2.5
10 E BOTH E-W 6 170 3 22 E E-W N-S 10 100 1.5
11 S NONE E-W 6 120 3 23 S BOTH N-S 10 -650 3
12 W N-S E-W 6 -650 1 24 W NONE N-S 10 450 4.5
SESSION SCORE: 68.00 PERCENT: 56.67 Session rank: 3/4(C)
Event rank: 3/4(C)
MASTER POINTS: 0.49 Red, 0.49 Black (Overall) (Stratum C)
QUALIFIED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 4
Thelma Vickers - Michael Carrigan
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum D Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE E-W 10 -400 2 13 N BOTH E-W 7 100 2
2 E N-S E-W 10 -100 0 14 E NONE E-W 7 50 5
3 S E-W E-W 10 870 5 15 S N-S E-W 7 460 5
4 W BOTH N-S 1 630 4.5 16 W E-W N-S 11 100 4.5
5 N N-S N-S 1 -300 0 17 N NONE N-S 11 140 5
6 E E-W N-S 1 -650 1.5 18 E N-S N-S 11 620 3.5
7 S BOTH E-W 9 -300 0 19 S E-W N-S 3 400 2
8 W NONE E-W 9 -140 1.5 20 W BOTH N-S 3 130 2
9 N E-W E-W 9 150 4 21 N N-S N-S 3 -490 2.5
10 E BOTH E-W 12 170 3 22 E E-W E-W 5 -150 1.5
11 S NONE E-W 12 150 4.5 23 S BOTH E-W 5 680 4.5
12 W N-S E-W 12 100 4 24 W NONE E-W 5 -450 0.5
SESSION SCORE: 68.00 PERCENT: 56.67 Session rank: 3/4(C) 2(D)
Event rank: 3/4(C) 2(D)
MASTER POINTS: 0.57 Red, 0.56 Black (Overall) (Stratum D)
QUALIFIED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 5
Stephen Edwards - Alan Goldman
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum E Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE E-W 6 -150 4.5 13 N BOTH E-W 12 400 5
2 E N-S E-W 6 200 5 14 E NONE E-W 12 -450 2
3 S E-W E-W 6 50 3 15 S N-S E-W 12 400 3
4 W BOTH E-W 10 -110 5 16 W E-W E-W 8 140 3
5 N N-S E-W 10 100 4 17 N NONE E-W 8 50 2.5
6 E E-W E-W 10 -100 1 18 E N-S E-W 8 -620 1.5
7 S BOTH N-S 2 -300 0 19 S E-W N-S 11 -170 0
8 W NONE N-S 2 150 5 20 W BOTH N-S 11 130 2
9 N E-W N-S 2 -170 0 21 N N-S N-S 11 -990 0.5
10 E BOTH N-S 9 -170 2 22 E E-W N-S 4 150 3.5
11 S NONE N-S 9 -150 0.5 23 S BOTH N-S 4 -680 0.5
12 W N-S N-S 9 -100 1 24 W NONE N-S 4 450 4.5
SESSION SCORE: 59.00 PERCENT: 49.17 Session rank: 4/5(D) 2/3(E)
Event rank: 4/5(D) 2/3(E)
MASTER POINTS: 0.28 Red, 0.45 Black (Overall) (Stratum D)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 6
Mel Deener - Sterling Brockwell
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum E Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE N-S 5 150 0.5 13 N BOTH N-S 9 PASS 4
2 E N-S N-S 5 -200 0 14 E NONE N-S 9 450 3
3 S E-W N-S 5 -50 2 15 S N-S N-S 9 50 3.5
4 W BOTH E-W 7 -130 3 16 W E-W E-W 12 140 3
5 N N-S E-W 7 -130 0 17 N NONE E-W 12 110 5
6 E E-W E-W 7 650 3.5 18 E N-S E-W 12 -620 1.5
7 S BOTH E-W 10 170 2 19 S E-W E-W 1 -420 2
8 W NONE E-W 10 130 5 20 W BOTH E-W 1 -130 3
9 N E-W E-W 10 100 1 21 N N-S E-W 1 490 2.5
10 E BOTH N-S 3 -170 2 22 E E-W N-S 11 150 3.5
11 S NONE N-S 3 -120 2 23 S BOTH N-S 11 -650 3
12 W N-S N-S 3 650 4 24 W NONE N-S 11 170 0
SESSION SCORE: 59.00 PERCENT: 49.17 Session rank: 4/5(D) 2/3(E)
Event rank: 4/5(D) 2/3(E)
MASTER POINTS: 0.28 Red, 0.45 Black (Overall) (Stratum D)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 7
Larry Calhoun - Emily Hungerford
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum D Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE N-S 11 300 2 13 N BOTH N-S 4 -100 3
2 E N-S N-S 11 -120 1 14 E NONE N-S 4 -50 0
3 S E-W N-S 11 500 4 15 S N-S N-S 4 -460 0
4 W BOTH N-S 6 130 2 16 W E-W E-W 9 -100 0.5
5 N N-S N-S 6 130 5 17 N NONE E-W 9 100 4
6 E E-W N-S 6 -650 1.5 18 E N-S E-W 9 -300 4
7 S BOTH E-W 8 200 3.5 19 S E-W E-W 12 -550 0.5
8 W NONE E-W 8 -100 3 20 W BOTH E-W 12 -200 0.5
9 N E-W E-W 8 110 2 21 N N-S E-W 12 460 1
10 E BOTH E-W 10 -110 1 22 E E-W E-W 2 -200 0
11 S NONE E-W 10 110 1.5 23 S BOTH E-W 2 -100 0
12 W N-S E-W 10 -650 1 24 W NONE E-W 2 -420 2
SESSION SCORE: 43.00 PERCENT: 35.83
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 8
Tony Zoppo - Norman Caine
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum E Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE E-W 3 -460 1 13 N BOTH N-S 10 110 5
2 E N-S E-W 3 -50 1 14 E NONE N-S 10 450 3
3 S E-W E-W 3 -800 0 15 S N-S N-S 10 50 3.5
4 W BOTH E-W 11 -630 0.5 16 W E-W N-S 5 -140 2
5 N N-S E-W 11 -120 1.5 17 N NONE N-S 5 -50 2.5
6 E E-W E-W 11 -100 1 18 E N-S N-S 5 620 3.5
7 S BOTH N-S 7 -200 1.5 19 S E-W E-W 9 -550 0.5
8 W NONE N-S 7 100 2 20 W BOTH E-W 9 -200 0.5
9 N E-W N-S 7 -110 3 21 N N-S E-W 9 990 4.5
10 E BOTH E-W 1 230 5 22 E E-W E-W 12 50 5
11 S NONE E-W 1 50 0 23 S BOTH E-W 12 680 4.5
12 W N-S E-W 1 -650 1 24 W NONE E-W 12 -200 3.5
SESSION SCORE: 55.50 PERCENT: 46.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 9
Joanna Johnson - John Taylor
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum D Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE E-W 2 -500 0 13 N BOTH E-W 6 PASS 1
2 E N-S E-W 2 110 3 14 E NONE E-W 6 -450 2
3 S E-W E-W 2 -300 2 15 S N-S E-W 6 -50 1.5
4 W BOTH N-S 3 130 2 16 W E-W N-S 7 100 4.5
5 N N-S N-S 3 90 2 17 N NONE N-S 7 -100 1
6 E E-W N-S 3 100 4 18 E N-S N-S 7 300 1
7 S BOTH N-S 4 300 5 19 S E-W N-S 8 550 4.5
8 W NONE N-S 4 140 3.5 20 W BOTH N-S 8 200 4.5
9 N E-W N-S 4 -150 1 21 N N-S N-S 8 -990 0.5
10 E BOTH E-W 5 170 3 22 E E-W E-W 1 -100 3.5
11 S NONE E-W 5 150 4.5 23 S BOTH E-W 1 650 2
12 W N-S E-W 5 100 4 24 W NONE E-W 1 -200 3.5
SESSION SCORE: 63.50 PERCENT: 52.92 Session rank: 5(C) 3(D)
Event rank: 3(D)
MASTER POINTS: 0.43 Red, 0.42 Black (Overall) (Stratum D)
QUALIFIED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 10
Rebecca Hutchison - Barbara McKee
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum D Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE N-S 4 400 3 13 N BOTH E-W 8 -110 0
2 E N-S N-S 4 100 5 14 E NONE E-W 8 -450 2
3 S E-W N-S 4 -870 0 15 S N-S E-W 8 -50 1.5
4 W BOTH N-S 5 110 0 16 W E-W E-W 1 140 3
5 N N-S N-S 5 -100 1 17 N NONE E-W 1 50 2.5
6 E E-W N-S 5 100 4 18 E N-S E-W 1 -620 1.5
7 S BOTH N-S 6 -170 3 19 S E-W E-W 2 100 4
8 W NONE N-S 6 -130 0 20 W BOTH E-W 2 -120 5
9 N E-W N-S 6 -100 4 21 N N-S E-W 2 450 0
10 E BOTH N-S 7 110 4 22 E E-W E-W 3 -100 3.5
11 S NONE N-S 7 -110 3.5 23 S BOTH E-W 3 650 2
12 W N-S N-S 7 650 4 24 W NONE E-W 3 -450 0.5
SESSION SCORE: 57.00 PERCENT: 47.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 11
Carolyn Ashley - Clark Woomer
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum E Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE E-W 7 -300 3 13 N BOTH N-S 3 -110 2
2 E N-S E-W 7 120 4 14 E NONE N-S 3 450 3
3 S E-W E-W 7 -500 1 15 S N-S N-S 3 -430 1
4 W BOTH N-S 8 630 4.5 16 W E-W E-W 4 -100 0.5
5 N N-S N-S 8 120 3.5 17 N NONE E-W 4 -140 0
6 E E-W N-S 8 100 4 18 E N-S E-W 4 -620 1.5
7 S BOTH N-S 1 -100 4 19 S E-W E-W 5 170 5
8 W NONE N-S 1 140 3.5 20 W BOTH E-W 5 -130 3
9 N E-W N-S 1 100 5 21 N N-S E-W 5 990 4.5
10 E BOTH N-S 2 300 5 22 E E-W E-W 6 -150 1.5
11 S NONE N-S 2 -110 3.5 23 S BOTH E-W 6 650 2
12 W N-S N-S 2 -100 1 24 W NONE E-W 6 -170 5
SESSION SCORE: 71.00 PERCENT: 59.17 Session rank: 2(C) 1(D) 1(E)
Event rank: 2(C) 1(D) 1(E)
MASTER POINTS: 0.76 Red, 0.75 Black (Overall) (Stratum D)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for Pair A 12
Ilse Anke - Maude Bergmann
Cypress Club Pairs Stratum C Wednesday Mor Session June 9, 2010
Vanderbilt 208710
Average: 60.0 Top on a Board: 5
BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE
1 N NONE N-S 1 150 0.5 13 N BOTH N-S 5 -400 0
2 E N-S N-S 1 -80 3 14 E NONE N-S 5 450 3
3 S E-W N-S 1 -140 1 15 S N-S N-S 5 -400 2
4 W BOTH N-S 2 130 2 16 W E-W N-S 6 -140 2
5 N N-S N-S 2 120 3.5 17 N NONE N-S 6 -110 0
6 E E-W N-S 2 -1430 0 18 E N-S N-S 6 620 3.5
7 S BOTH N-S 3 -200 1.5 19 S E-W N-S 7 550 4.5
8 W NONE N-S 3 -100 1 20 W BOTH N-S 7 200 4.5
9 N E-W N-S 3 -140 2 21 N N-S N-S 7 -460 4
10 E BOTH N-S 4 -170 2 22 E E-W N-S 8 -50 0
11 S NONE N-S 4 -150 0.5 23 S BOTH N-S 8 -680 0.5
12 W N-S N-S 4 -100 1 24 W NONE N-S 8 200 1.5
SESSION SCORE: 43.50 PERCENT: 36.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|